From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:01:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871ucsjdl1.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360256567 17410 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2013 17:02:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:02:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13649@debbugs.gnu.org To: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 18:03:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UsL-0004ly-B4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:03:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48256 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Us2-00072A-IM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:02:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Ury-000713-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:02:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Urw-0005D5-3r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Urw-0005CO-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UtF-0004K5-W4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13649.136025658416553 (code B ref 13649); Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2013 17:03:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UsK-0004Iw-IE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:53816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3UsJ-0004In-21 for 13649@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r17H1d4R012511; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6D924B4030; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 12:01:39 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <871ucsjdl1.fsf@jidanni.org> (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:25:30 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4485=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4485> : streams <902229> : uri <1339315> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70821 Archived-At: > & runs the command dired-do-async-shell-command, which is an > interactive autoloaded compiled Lisp function in `dired-aux.el'. > It sometimes will ask > A command is running in the default buffer. Use a new buffer? (yes or no) > Which is a boobytrapped question, as picking "no" will always end up > in failure... > So perhaps rewrite it so one knows there is only one good choice if one > wants to proceed... Maybe a better fix is to add a message afterwards, along the lines of "Haha! Gotcha!" Stefan