From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45333: complex command history should not save optional nil parameters Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:49:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0DJzRuBn1S9jW_MoJt5HXcLQWrzb7Vjkfmlwa9zPvgLIFeEfdPLoiguSztbL4TnuHyxd59Z7BpS9qJo5BinMO3n1mDlWjcytLjq9HmoGIl0=@protonmail.com> <8735ggk7nz.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee007gxo.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7z3bcsp.fsf@gnus.org> <875ykbabl1.fsf@web.de> <87o7y31pho.fsf@gnus.org> <87wncrs8js.fsf@web.de> <87sfnfmm41.fsf@gnus.org> <87k08rs7jg.fsf@web.de> <87bku3ml4x.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsjfs5v2.fsf@web.de> <871quzmj9a.fsf@gnus.org> <87o7y3l1xm.fsf@gnus.org> <87v8s9idnx.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfndf1xp.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14757"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , laszlomail@protonmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , 45333@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 07 16:50:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Spf-0003ZQ-GR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:50:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Spe-0003RD-38 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:50:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9SpO-0003Qm-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9SpO-0007z0-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9SpO-0005PK-59 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45333 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 45333-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45333.165720537020737 (code B ref 45333); Thu, 07 Jul 2022 14:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45333) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2022 14:49:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57561 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Sos-0005OP-Da for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:3830) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9Soq-0005O8-MR for 45333@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2022 10:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 30CF0100163; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9DA7D100130; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:49:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1657205361; bh=aR23KCbsodmJyEsWufWgu+pY286DRJdV+sWNxaGKomI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mLkfoQ8nKeggGJUughig6dRzByvpB/iqjCHYXcEAmp9dUtFOC1X2e3hS2kyCRSzox iF8rUFigjcHM4DtiG7Br+StERF8hYbd5VayZoYxvTbyg8mr8gCFbWth9SlAy36foI6 iJlwSRMcjbVNxishvI5Dg3KmptIJlnZorfqxOPgpdmQqzvXanC8ZkgXJkgswInEGsT y4mBTi/yuTdTBbEVFDlZ6hp2+8Nlc0ATN9FEulMObpca4ZYZ2HGLD2nXPf7/KEsueU Qbqa3mcqUh1jkPL59TrEqzZxU3dBh6dHGNpmXfzMYMFTsugrMgXB7hY/PJoxqWX+nb igqmAsosvMWhg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.196.165]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BCF312033F; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 10:49:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sfndf1xp.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:10:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236377 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-07-07 16:10:58] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >>> For 1), we could also stash the actual arglist in addition to the >>> advertised calling convention into .elc/DOC (i.e., two (fn ...) forms, >>> for instance). >> Why/when do we need the non-advertized arglist? > Because (foo [bar zot] ...) isn't very helpful when doing low level > stuff. Sorry, both (foo [bar zot] ...) and "doing low level stuff" sound a bit too hypothetical for me to get a sense of what we're talking about. More specifically I don't know of any use of advertized signature that presents the args with a [...] notation, and I can't remember ever needing a pretty arglist when working on "low-level stuff". Stefan