unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Roland Winkler <winkler@gnu.org>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>,
	50202@debbugs.gnu.org, Yuu Yin <yuuyin@protonmail.com>
Subject: bug#50202: bibtex-mode: unescaped dollar sign in file field leads to wrong highlighting
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:41:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvfshk2pke.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sflkjn5i.fsf@gnu.org> (Roland Winkler's message of "Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:36:25 -0500")

>> But I wonder how important it is for `bibtex-mode` to try and recognize
>> the (La)TeX meaning of the $ character.
>> Maybe we should just give $ the punctuation syntax in the syntax-table.
>
> The (La)TeX meaning of the $ character is relevant for titles that my
> contain formulas.  The question is what is in the end more acceptable:
> formulas in titles that do not receive special treatment by font-lock.
> Or $ being mis-treated in url and file fields (which goes beyond these
> fields).  Maybe it is best to let the user decide whether $ should be
> treated as math delimiter (the default) or as punctation.

The downside of treating $ as punctuation is that $^2$ won't be
highlighted specially, but the upside is that "foo$bar" won't be
mishighlighted in a url.

To me the highlighting of math formulas is sufficiently secondary that
I'd err on the safe side (i.e. avoid mishighlighting).  The other option
is to try and make this choice on a field-by-field basis, which seems
like a lot of work for fairly little benefit.


        Stefan






  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-25 17:48 bug#50202: bibtex-mode: unescaped dollar sign in file field leads to wrong highlighting Yuu Yin via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-08-22 14:33 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-08-25  2:58   ` Roland Winkler
2022-08-25 12:52     ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-08-25 16:36       ` Roland Winkler
2022-08-25 17:41         ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2022-08-26 15:52           ` Roland Winkler
2022-08-26 19:00             ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-08-29 15:19               ` Roland Winkler
2022-12-30  5:49                 ` Roland Winkler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwvfshk2pke.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
    --to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=50202@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=winkler@gnu.org \
    --cc=yuuyin@protonmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).