From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7307: 24.0.50; Mode line had more than just dashes removed Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:32:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871v78mwg3.fsf@escher.home> <831v786un1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrozbykb.fsf@escher.home> <87iq0g6hi2.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288713430 22563 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2010 15:57:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 15:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7307@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 16:57:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDJEO-0004uz-KQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 16:57:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDJEN-0005WR-UK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 11:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37185 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDI56-0006sn-82 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDI54-00024z-OZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDI54-00024M-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:43:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDHrB-0008A5-SU; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7307 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7307-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7307.128870811731367 (code B ref 7307); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7307) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2010 14:28:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDHqm-00089s-RQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDHql-00089l-21 for 7307@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:28:35 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oA2EWtv9004351; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:32:55 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 46C14B4500; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:32:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87iq0g6hi2.fsf@escher.home> (Stephen Berman's message of "Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:11:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3666=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:29:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41370 Archived-At: > Hm, this may be conceptually simpler but at least for me not simpler to > implement, if I understand what you're suggesting, namely, that the > filler character should be provided by a defcustom, which is defined in > xdisp.c; is that right? Before I try to do that, is the following > consistent with what you're suggesting (aside from lack the > configurability)? If not, could you be more specific? Yes, that's pretty much what I meant, except for the lack of configurability. To make it configurable, we'll need to build the lots_of_ string dynamically in all cases. Maybe that can be done by removing the test of field_width. Stefan