From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8764: 24.0.50; cedet/semantic/bovine/c-by.el:184:1:Error: Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth' Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:15:59 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87ipssktyz.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306793833 3734 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2011 22:17:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8764@debbugs.gnu.org To: Christopher Browne Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 00:17:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAlm-0008O3-Ts for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:17:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52191 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAlm-0008Kz-FD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAli-0008Kp-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAli-0007qD-0h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42420) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAlh-0007q9-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAlh-0003H4-UM; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8764 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8764-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8764.130679376812523 (code B ref 8764); Mon, 30 May 2011 22:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8764) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2011 22:16:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAkp-0003Fw-5E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAko-0003FQ-FV for 8764@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [190.194.233.124] (port=53653 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRAkj-00054I-6d; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:16:01 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6B353660D3; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:15:59 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Christopher Browne's message of "Mon, 30 May 2011 15:19:30 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 18:17:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46821 Archived-At: > That isn't quite a scientific evaluation of what ought to be > necessary, but it sure seems that the value can need to be higher than > 1200, and it's pretty plausible that 1635 only helps until an extra > couple elements get added to the parser, increasing stack usage. Since 1200 seems sufficient during bootstrap, it would be worthwhile to try and figure out what is different between your case and the bootstrap case. Stefan