From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20254: 25.0.50; `face' overlays with equal priority at the same location Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:14:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <841dbe06-ed20-4d8d-8bb3-c9245a2a65ed@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1428099386 991 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2015 22:16:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20254@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 04 00:16:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9sr-000114-I3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:16:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35695 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9sq-00069T-Mk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9sm-00068G-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9sg-0000EG-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:16:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9sg-0000EA-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9sg-0005tm-1o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20254 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20254-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20254.142809930422600 (code B ref 20254); Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Apr 2015 22:15:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9ri-0005sA-PX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:1852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ye9rg-0005rf-BR for 20254@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 18:15:00 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnEFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOfQYIugQiBdQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgTohGMZAkBAgECgz4DCgcIAQKDVASoOw X-IPAS-Result: AnEFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3gVOfQYIugQiBdQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgTohGMZAkBAgECgz4DCgcIAQKDVASoOw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="115364905" Original-Received: from 65-110-216-75.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([65.110.216.75]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Apr 2015 18:14:54 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1BDC819E0; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 18:14:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <841dbe06-ed20-4d8d-8bb3-c9245a2a65ed@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101168 Archived-At: > Is there a rule behind this behavior? If an overlay is nested inside another, then it takes precedence. If neither is nested in the other then the precedence is not documented (IIRC it's arbitrarily taken to be "the one that's closest to point-min", and if start and end at the same position, then the precedence depends on the 100% arbitrary addresses of the overlays in memory). Stefan