From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:54:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8739tm9vzl.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> <2223f654-1e67-4a9a-a471-828fd4078410@default> <87fumokzbp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1bc3x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1hrlek2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg27bjah.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360njb9o5.fsf@gnu.org> <877f7zksm0.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1a9msk.fsf@gnu.org> <83vavf73ei.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ne6v1q.fsf@gnu.org> <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480186526 2274 195.159.176.226 (26 Nov 2016 18:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:55:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, johnw@gnu.org, 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 26 19:55:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7v-0006Kc-OV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 19:55:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7z-0005WQ-DU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:55:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7t-0005Ui-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7q-0003iv-O7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:55:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7q-0003iY-KZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7q-0007l0-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6991.148018648529792 (code B ref 6991); Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2016 18:54:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7Z-0007kS-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:54:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:19157) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAi7X-0007kG-JR for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:54:44 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DcBQALW9BX/9qixEVdGwEBAQMBAQGDLQEBAQEBHoRNt0mGFgQCAoFpPBEBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RiAQEDAVYjBQsLNBIUGA1SiCcIvFUBAQEBBgIBJIp9hQyFEAWPHYo8kRUWhF6DBIYLjw2BPjQggmUegWsehgoBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0DcBQALW9BX/9qixEVdGwEBAQMBAQGDLQEBAQEBHoRNt0mGFgQCAoFpPBEBAgEBAQEBAQFeJ4RiAQEDAVYjBQsLNBIUGA1SiCcIvFUBAQEBBgIBJIp9hQyFEAWPHYo8kRUWhF6DBIYLjw2BPjQggmUegWsehgoBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,296,1470715200"; d="scan'208";a="280710893" Original-Received: from 69-196-162-218.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO milanesa.home) ([69.196.162.218]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 26 Nov 2016 13:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: by milanesa.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 77C5E660E7; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 13:54:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs's message of "Sat, 26 Nov 2016 12:18:00 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126125 Archived-At: > Yes, there's no perfect solution. That's why I prefer to solve just the > immediate problem by extending the escaping in `print' to cover null > bytes. FWIW, I agree. The only issue I can see here is that depending on how it's done, it could affect the size of the .elc files (by using two bytes per bytecode 0 rather than 1). Nothing too terrible, but it's probably worth checking whether it does make such a difference and if so how serious it is. Stefan