From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:44:25 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87r63gzcap.fsf@jurta.org> <49671922.4080609@gmx.at> <87zlhubw10.fsf@jurta.org> <496DF4B9.3080805@gmx.at> <496E5F58.7030304@gmx.at> <496F11C0.4080700@gmx.at> <87ocy8fajt.fsf@jurta.org> <4975F4D5.5030000@gmx.at> <87y6tk1j47.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <49F7FE14.8010107@gmx.at> <49FFE515.4020608@gmx.at> <87vdnzpks0.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A11184A.1020805@gmx.at> <18961.16292.147715.230995@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <4A11513D.40403@gmx.at> <18961.30951.388917.452401@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 1806@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242676399 6593 80.91.229.12 (18 May 2009 19:53:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1806@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Roland Winkler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 18 21:53:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M68tZ-0008Fk-Uz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 21:53:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55558 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M68tZ-00068g-Bj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M68sd-0005UT-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M68sT-0005OY-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48276 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M68sS-0005OQ-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:41774) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M68sS-00017Q-7B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n4IJpuDo004357; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:51:57 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n4IJo3Xs003143; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:50:03 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1806 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1806-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1806.12426758841646 (code B ref 1806); Mon, 18 May 2009 19:50:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1806) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 May 2009 19:44:44 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n4IJichR001606 for <1806@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 18 May 2009 12:44:40 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqwFABdYEUpMCovv/2dsb2JhbACBT810hAEFhWo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.41,211,1241409600"; d="scan'208";a="38737802" Original-Received: from 76-10-139-239.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.139.239]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 18 May 2009 15:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6A727B4136; Mon, 18 May 2009 15:44:25 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <18961.30951.388917.452401@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> (Roland Winkler's message of "Mon, 18 May 2009 17:04:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:52:07 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27985 Archived-At: >> I meant whether `proced' which uses `pop-to-buffer' has any preferences >> about where and how to pop up that buffer. > I see. I have never much thought about that. If anyone has some > argument why it might be better that Proced used something else > instead of a simple call of pop-to-buffer, I'd be happy to use some > appropriate code. Otherwise I suggest to keep it the way it is now > (or wait till after the next release). Certainly, Proced is > different from Dired in the sense that normally one will have only > one such buffer. We should refrain from using anything else than just a plain `pop-to-buffer', except for those cases where it is clearly problematic. Stefan