From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15573: 24.3.50; `comment-end' in c mode Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:17:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1381342710 10197 80.91.229.3 (9 Oct 2013 18:18:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 18:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15573-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 09 20:18:33 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyL8-0000Ml-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:18:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyL8-0000D2-Eg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:18:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyKy-0000B4-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyKr-0005a9-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyKh-0005UL-EB; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyKh-0003iQ-52; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:18:03 -0400 Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 15573 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 15573@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 15573-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D15573.138134266614232 (code D ref 15573); Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15573-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2013 18:17:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38295 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyKP-0003hT-JA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VTyKN-0003hL-H6 for 15573-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 14:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r99IHfnw012072; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:17:41 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8C70AB4149; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 14:17:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:55:38 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4726=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4726> : inlines <135> : streams <1053045> : uri <1560451> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79109 Archived-At: > But `comment-end' can also be used to recognize the end of a comment, No: that's what comment-end-skip is for. Stefan