From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16108: 24.3; Add optional arg to indent-region Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386773537 17642 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2013 14:52:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16108@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 11 15:52:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql9B-00076S-OV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:52:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql9B-0008Fb-Bw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql91-0008Cc-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8s-0006RR-N0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8s-0006RN-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8s-0007UK-71 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16108 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 16108-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16108.138677349528752 (code B ref 16108); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16108) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2013 14:51:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8Q-0007Tf-VA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:35 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:45815) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vql8P-0007TX-11 for 16108@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBBEpU1t010730; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BBA2CAE321; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:51:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:18:34 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4788=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4788> : inlines <303> : streams <1089098> : uri <1620898> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81758 Archived-At: > I use indent-region non-interactively and the progress report gets in > the way. So I propose make it possible to suppress it. Objections? I'm not really opposed, but I'd like to understand in which way it "gets in the way". Can you give more details? Stefan