From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34920: 27.0.50; Poor eww rendering of SourceHut file "trees" Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:20:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="44898"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34920@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 21 14:27:49 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xjY-000BYN-6a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 14:27:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37183 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xjX-0002BF-6d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xjH-00021u-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:27:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xd2-0000ye-UP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xd0-0000rL-73 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xcz-0004Af-VM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34920 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34920-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34920.155317441215957 (code B ref 34920); Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34920) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2019 13:20:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xcB-00049J-Uu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:20:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.201]:33812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h6xcA-000491-Dj for 34920@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:20:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DBC810EBAC for <34920@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:20:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; h=content-type:content-type:mime-version:user-agent:in-reply-to :date:date:references:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from; s=dkim; t=1553174403; x=1554038404; bh=3/2aYa4zXM4k7ESZ3wrnN2Gl K9IEY9B4tjkwWu6wE7U=; b=B97n8ufoIlcIbBKpsegwW253wFQDtVumT4Gkbshf poQ1XN/pz+KdWPD8ZIV4jLzd4OlBz82bT6fpOGFpF5fzT1hGQ0hTbtpNARb656WA Go1+rIi3llwA1GO+gLjguJUAeBnzT8qek2PKyNXJUMRhzRBu2A+xxWLGNamCuZ0b 8Iktis8GjBYQsjQ+DicPHAgtrQDWx73quKbUcLzJ+82eucDT7CbHZ/++B6uBAVmK IbELxNowiKmz0xIfG+hSKmYdKtTr2c69gw1850gzyyYOiYTtkraingdt6BhTcUnP XZUSBysl+Alt5AyQKXSh+XTqa1V13SR7ac7jvXCLvxQyVg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at iro.umontreal.ca Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (mail01.iro.umontreal.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vnVqd1u0ESv1 for <34920@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:20:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (75-119-242-252.dsl.teksavvy.com [75.119.242.252]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 347A3810EB94; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:20:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 21 Mar 2019 13:44:50 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156566 Archived-At: > shr will never support more than an itsy-bitsy CSS subset (due to both > speed and layout considerations), [ Never say never, but, yes, that sounds about right. ] > so fetching CSS externally would be a disservice to the users. Not sure I understand why you think so: is it because of (1) the time wasted fetching it or (2) the slowdown imposed by parsing it or (3) the slowdown imposed on the rendering when the CSS is large or (4) ...? My impression is that just (1) would rarely be a performance problem (assuming it's just one CSS file) and that the parsing could ditch all the irrelevant properties we don't support anyway so the impact of (3) should be minor. So is it (2)? > And asking web designers to change their pages so that they'll look > better in non-CSS browser isn't really scaleable. :-) So what the solution? Stefan