From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83czmqaegb.fsf@gnu.org> <874k82vwe5.fsf@gnus.org> <831r35afde.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90hu36b.fsf@gnus.org> <83v90h8zjw.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1b5u1cl.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqp8vps.fsf@gnu.org> <87v90ge5rc.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6hr9k79.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6hruk4u.fsf@gnus.org> <875ysfujya.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee73t10k.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6235"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philipp Stephani , Filipp Gunbin , 52063@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 17:59:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeZK-0001Pc-86 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 17:59:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39810 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeZI-0005GH-Iy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeZ3-0005F8-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeYv-0006i9-Mf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:59:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeYv-0005QD-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52063 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 52063-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52063.163794589320784 (code B ref 52063); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52063) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2021 16:58:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeY9-0005PA-6F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:54850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqeY7-0005Ow-9y for 52063@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3BAD4440A32; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 900AE4409E9; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:03 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1637945883; bh=7VqdDXy9FR2hUi7Y0gmJy1eV6fejhFWnDB/wJ7tdYfk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=l9arA1SX8zqH8GJUZBzjV/agrteMtadwTZrZ6PJYrhievXD+HBAt9Sm4W6IQNDV4w ckPHZ0JpbDSVIgT9YEtKFE5CL+KRcSRqGnpgNTPyfQTjI/8oT3G8EUlluheUOLn+sF CJMQRD02ixdT/K2MWTLiq9rAW66ygFW2Q/sPX7tdP5R7+LPL4AuTf9sznHbh13MB6S Mf+2jpXi8GrJaWH5ViNHmoxKpB8tR1JmUugY+VOtOYWEragE7qye7H7f5dKNAOKQz0 vy22Hma5sYWLbFYczX4t0l0/U99hXfNJW8qsuWFU5Mb6Wd5EjGAKxk5lcWrs2Z5l5R lzrgFiKJi7MEA== Original-Received: from ceviche (modemcable124.78-161-184.mc.videotron.ca [184.161.78.124]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EAFC12097F; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ee73t10k.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:00:43 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220885 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen [2021-11-26 16:00:43] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> My objection was to: >> >> (Which would also mean that we'd have to allow `declare' in lambdas, >> which I think we should anyway.) > > You don't think we should allow `declare' in lambdas? It'd allow us to > implement things like "named lambdas" more easily. I object to linking the two issues because one is about the `lambda` expressions in source code and the other is about runtime representation of function values and the two are fundamentally distinct (e.g. most runtime function values are compiled). Stefan