From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8781: bug#8730: bug#8781: bug#8730: bug#8781: 24.0.50; unload-feature don't restore default key Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:26:42 -0300 Message-ID: References: <4DE628AC.9000604@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307024857 13444 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2011 14:27:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 14:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8781@debbugs.gnu.org, 8730@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 02 16:27:33 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8s0-0001N9-PF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:27:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55934 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rz-0002hw-Ar for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8ra-0002hF-KR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rY-0004UO-Q7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39649) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rY-0004UH-HI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rX-00074U-Bm; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:27:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:27:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8781 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8781-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8781.130702481327152 (code B ref 8781); Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:27:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8781) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2011 14:26:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rM-00073q-QJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rK-00073Z-Kg; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:52261 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QS8rE-0002Gd-SA; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9D7DA660DD; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:26:42 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:59:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:27:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46891 Archived-At: >>> Or are you proposing to go through the buffer list and checking >>> whether their major modes are defined in the package being unloaded? >> Ah, yes, indeed, that's another solution that would work as well. > I prefer that, because it is more thorough. There's no point in a > buffer keeping a major mode that is going to be undefined. Agreed. > But anyway, this is a new feature, sort of. Yes, it's clearly not for emacs-23. Stefan