From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11314: 24.1.50; Regression: incorrect Lisp indentation for `if' with `@@@@@@' Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:58:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335229173 26674 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2012 00:59:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11314@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 02:59:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6G-0008OX-Mb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:59:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48427 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6F-0001Yd-Vd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6D-0001YY-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6A-0003mm-Us for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6A-0003ma-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6s-00026x-Bh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11314 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11314-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11314.13352291958071 (code B ref 11314); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 01:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11314) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2012 00:59:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6k-000267-Jy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:12489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMU6g-00025t-Hs for 11314@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:59:51 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEKACxOgk/O+Jnc/2dsb2JhbABDtheCDAOBDIEIggkBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW2MothhHkEpEWBXYMD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="176386566" Original-Received: from 206-248-153-220.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.153.220]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Apr 2012 20:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EDF3858EB0; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:58:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:56:10 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59424 Archived-At: > Yet @@@@@@ is a perfectly good symbol/variable name etc. FWIW, this is probably due to @ being special in the case of ,@, so if we fix this, we should be careful not to reintroduce errors such as C-h v trying to use "@foo" rather than "foo" when we're on ",@foo". Stefan