From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11649: 24.1.50; Some compilation woes Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:40:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83r4tou93e.fsf@gnu.org> <83zk8bswgw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339339302 4918 80.91.229.3 (10 Jun 2012 14:41:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, 11649@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 10 16:41:41 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjKi-0003t8-In for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 16:41:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53746 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjKi-0005DO-Ey for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:41:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53381) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjKf-0005Cn-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:41:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjKe-0006Vs-4Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:41:33 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjKe-0006Vl-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:41:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjN4-00006Z-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11649.1339339410358 (code B ref 11649); Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jun 2012 14:43:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36790 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjMX-00005j-Ru for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:28877) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SdjMV-00005b-2d for 11649@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:43:27 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAG6Zu09FxIfQ/2dsb2JhbABEsEiDSYEIghUBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="190911593" Original-Received: from 69-196-135-208.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.196.135.208]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 10 Jun 2012 10:40:55 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BE4FDAE279; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:40:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83zk8bswgw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 10 Jun 2012 05:59:43 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60838 Archived-At: >> > By contrast, on MS-Windows, all of the Lisp files are compiled with >> > the bootstrapped Emacs executable, so they all are compiled with the >> > interpreted byte compiler. >> Ahh... that could explain this high stack use. That should also impose >> a fairly high impact on compilation speed. > But note that previously, 1200 was enough for the same compilation, > and the speed was also much higher. Yes, the stack depth is probably linked to the 8x speed impact discussed elsewhere. > Maybe I'm missing something, but it sounds likeyour scenario requires > two compilations of cl-macs.el. That's right. > If so, this scenario cannot explain the problem, because cl-macs.el is > compiled exactly once during bootstrap; before the compilation there's > only cl-macs.el. Then, we need to investigate the real source of the problem. Does someone have a reproducible recipe for it? Stefan