From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12124: 24.1.50; warning pollution Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:52:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87txwlkxwd.fsf@kanis.fr> <87ipd19o8s.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1343987617 12019 80.91.229.3 (3 Aug 2012 09:53:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12124@debbugs.gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 11:53:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEZb-00010H-53 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:53:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEZa-00062r-J6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:53:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEZZ-00062m-2J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:53:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEZT-0005uu-Sg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:53:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEZT-0005uq-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 05:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEgo-0002jg-9k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12124 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12124-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12124.134398801710462 (code B ref 12124); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2012 10:00:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58311 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEg4-0002ig-RE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34527) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxEg2-0002ia-V1 for 12124@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 06:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q739qbD9014123; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 05:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 29CC9AE2F8; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 05:52:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ipd19o8s.fsf@gmail.com> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2012 19:50:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4298=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4298> : streams <793913> : uri <1182674> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62786 Archived-At: > Why instead of keeping old definitions of labels and flet don't we use > aliases for cl-flet/labels (among others)? Because they do not do the same (almost, but not quite). > It would also fix a problem of compatibility of compiled files between > 24.1 and 24.2.(All files containing flet or labels need recompilation). That's news to me: these macros should return code that's independent from CL, so they should not require recompilation. Please report with details. Stefan