From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k3w8tkby.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346872386 5969 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2012 19:13:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 21:13:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L25-0007UF-PN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:13:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55099 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L22-0001mF-Nx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L1z-0001lv-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L1y-0006pk-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L1y-0006pe-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L26-0006hq-5s; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.134687234625731 (code B ref 9243); Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Sep 2012 19:12:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L1V-0006gx-Ur for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:64949) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T9L1U-0006gr-CI for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:12:24 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxINJ/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="197594477" Original-Received: from 69-196-131-73.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.131.73]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Sep 2012 15:12:15 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4E719588E8; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 15:12:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3w8tkby.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2012 20:07:13 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63802 Archived-At: > Discrepancies in NNTP groups are to be expected. NNTP just reports > high/low article numbers, and spam removal bots may remove articles. So > Gnus may believe that there are 20 new articles in the group, but upon > entering the group, half may already be gone. I know that. But what I'm describing is different: - `g' tells me N unread articles - then RET enters the group to discover there aren't any unread article - so I exit and hit `g' again - at which point Gnus tells me again that there are N (same N as before) unread articles. Stefan