From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13457: 24.2.92; completion-table-in-turn and *Completions* Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:51:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358351626 19305 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2013 15:53:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:53:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13457@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 16 16:54:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVJQ-0005nw-Mu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:54:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35047 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVJA-0002uW-5Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:53:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60489) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVHx-000124-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:52:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVHu-0005xf-UV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVHu-0005xL-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:52:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVIT-0005Gw-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13457 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13457-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13457.135835155320230 (code B ref 13457); Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13457) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2013 15:52:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35443 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVI0-0005GD-L8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:52:33 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:36242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TvVHy-0005G6-9z for 13457@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r0GFproZ001214; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:51:53 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B936AB4368; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:51:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:10:33 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4463=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4463> : streams <890337> : uri <1320334> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69868 Archived-At: > An occasion arose for completion-table-in-turn but disappointed to > discovered this deficiency. It's not a bug, it's a feature. It's not a union of two completion tables, but more like "short-circuiting OR" where the second table is only considered if the first doesn't match the input. Stefan