From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18253: 24.4.50; doc string of `remq': correct it per the doc of `remove' Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:34:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409078131 17378 80.91.229.3 (26 Aug 2014 18:35:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18253@debbugs.gnu.org, tsugutomo.enami@jp.sony.com To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 26 20:35:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLaW-0001Ea-AY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:35:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLaV-00056K-Sl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46771) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLaJ-0004vq-HR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLaB-000501-5c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLaB-0004zi-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLaA-0005L9-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18253 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18253-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18253.140907804620437 (code B ref 18253); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18253) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2014 18:34:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52731 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLZF-0005JY-2S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:59020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XMLZC-0005JQ-RO for 18253@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s7QIY10T019322; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F40F3AE093; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:34:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:37:27 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5045=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <5045> : inlines <1210> : streams <1274489> : uri <1806998> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92684 Archived-At: > If the only elements in LIST that are `eq' to ELT occur before any > other elements then a copy is not made: the tail after the last such > occurrence is returned. > Whatever language we choose, it should be precise wrt what the behavior > is. I don't see a need for precision. It should just say that the returned list may share some elements with the original argument, but that no element was modified by side-effect. Stefan