From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20193: 25.0.50; declarative type specification for D-Bus args Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:08:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87bnjgat6z.fsf@gmx.de> <874mp628is.fsf@gmx.de> <87613wkhkm.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441296563 24527 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2015 16:09:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Albinus , 20193@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daiki Ueno Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 03 18:09:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX4Z-0003SS-Uc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:09:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49784 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX4Z-0006eV-NS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX4U-0006bR-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX4Q-0004Xl-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:09:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX4Q-0004Xg-Le for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX4Q-0005ZL-BE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20193 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20193.144129651821355 (code B ref 20193); Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2015 16:08:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47827 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX41-0005YM-HK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:08:37 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:33041) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXX40-0005YD-GK for 20193@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 12:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t83G8ZHt002367; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 49CC566110; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:08:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daiki Ueno's message of "Wed, 02 Sep 2015 16:24:42 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5418=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5418> : inlines <3752> : streams <1499231> : uri <2031714> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106112 Archived-At: > Thanks for the prompt review. I was actually not sure about the > standard usage of subfeatures, and copied the logic from process.c, subfeatures should be conceptually a set, represented concretely as a list. > where they are defined as a plist That'd be a bug (that happens to be harmless if each value in the plist is nil or t, since it's like adding nil and t to set of subfeatures). > (featurep 'make-network-process '(:server t)) Bad idea. > (featurep 'make-network-process :server) That would be right. Stefan