From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:55:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83il8dna30.fsf@gnu.org> <83bke5mhvs.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5tmk79p.fsf@gnu.org> <937d9927-506f-aa36-94e9-3cceb8f629dd@gutov.dev> <83zg1hay6q.fsf@gnu.org> <451d6012-e5ab-df6c-50e3-dac20b91781c@gutov.dev> <83led09dlk.fsf@gnu.org> <1d43341a-2e7c-9f1d-68e9-9bac6f4b5fba@gutov.dev> <838r8w3zr2.fsf@gnu.org> <868qzwwoif.fsf@gnu.org> <86o78bd473.fsf@gnu.org> <15f746d0-e635-47a0-a613-2ea31523966a@gutov.dev> <5922967c-1a6e-4b6e-b299-37fb598e5eca@gutov.dev> <86frtk6kfs.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39759"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, stefankangas@gmail.com, 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 18:34:30 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4S6-000A7A-6M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:34:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4Rh-00018g-MS; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4Rf-00018K-RO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4Rf-0003zq-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4Rd-0004qj-LU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66020 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D66020.171812358218569 (code D ref 66020); Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66020-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2024 16:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36075 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4Qg-0004pQ-IK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38999) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH4Qf-0004ow-E5 for 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C5A304424B4; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:55:55 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1718110554; bh=vDh/+HB7QEBppgFKPR+q5GtMxjo2lGE5YLjRTLLVXfk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ohKzl9BbLaLEelzj23/njsWh6I12b8NC4D51fnNYr3OvkbUCuy3+tKZ635W06ZlUG MgcghzHon/fqQ19eruDNhRj3ZlYmS8LwCDvx9Oi3aFC3wRMUfv3IDFu0IuyjvPdCv3 nzvb+trmrHoM7bMpQPxfG38X1iyXko4+bUl+uTyBa9ydwfhtUvSqc/uCDrciwVf/qL YN5TjNik862Veoiee9CChwfZjC3tkIJOhLx7x/I44lRe6tUDPvVqdE9kqe+u8QDSMv qR268dxE5snUzF5MnNI1p3RP3xTkimIqROHaMjyU50MMJwFS06bOtNYDXHzPV0eJrl 0XreSy+0ch6Jw== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9E4FC4420B8; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:55:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [24.140.236.196]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61D9B12032C; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:55:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <86frtk6kfs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 11 Jun 2024 09:51:51 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287093 Archived-At: > Technically, this is okay, but I'd like to hear from Stefan about > whether it's correct to insert process output before the markers. AFAIK, when the insertion is done by the default process filter, it's indeed done "before the markers". I have no idea why it's done this way and would have preferred it to be different in many cases, but it's been that way forever and changing it would inevitably break some code. Stefan