From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8646: byte-compile-initial-macro-environment confuses byte-compile-arglist-warn Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 23:18:58 -0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305858013 1084 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2011 02:20:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 02:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8646@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 20 04:20:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFJw-0003KE-Gi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 04:20:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFJw-0002B7-09 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFJs-00029C-VH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:20:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFJs-00085D-2g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFJr-000856-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFJr-0000xW-3G; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:20:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 02:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8646 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8646-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8646.13058579483614 (code B ref 8646); Fri, 20 May 2011 02:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8646) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 May 2011 02:19:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFIx-0000wF-Pk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:19:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFIv-0000vh-R2 for 8646@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:19:06 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:2636 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNFIq-0004Q7-FF; Thu, 19 May 2011 22:19:00 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 710B866230; Thu, 19 May 2011 23:18:58 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 19 May 2011 15:06:35 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 22:20:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46601 Archived-At: >> It makes some sense, indeed. But I'm not thrilled about this solution. >> I'd rather change the defmacro to match the override. > I think I'd rather put up with the warning. Good idea, Stefan