From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10458: 24.0.92; ! in dired on a file starting with a hyphen Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:23:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wr92j6y6.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326205511 4964 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2012 14:25:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10458@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 10 15:25:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkcdJ-00059a-NI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:25:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32870 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkcdG-0002YN-Na for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43241) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkcd8-0002Xy-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkcd0-00060k-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:50 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkcd0-00060a-NS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RkcdJ-0004vc-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:25:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10458 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10458-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10458.132620546218888 (code B ref 10458); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10458) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2012 14:24:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkccf-0004ub-FO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:50378) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rkccd-0004uS-4n for 10458@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:24:19 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0AENv9s004704; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:23:57 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2BE8658DA7; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:23:54 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:02:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4096=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4096> : streams <718472> : uri <1044192> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55608 Archived-At: > Then perhaps it is academic, but I see no ambiguity, since dired keeps > command and file(s) to operate on separate: > ! gcc -o foo RET > ! gcc -c RET How 'bout "! diff -u oldfoo RET"? Stefan