From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12855: 24.2; The Messages buffer stops following the appended lines. Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <50A0C7DA.3080001@gmx.at> <50A13291.2080009@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1352753871 26579 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2012 20:57:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:57:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Yves Baumes , 12855@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 12 21:58:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14r-0002Tx-T5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:57:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14i-0008NW-B7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50877) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14d-0008MG-M0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14a-0007ls-Jn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:39 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54172) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14a-0007lo-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY150-0004sC-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12855 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12855-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12855.135275386018705 (code B ref 12855); Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12855) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2012 20:57:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36190 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14e-0004rc-CV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:44807) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TY14b-0004rV-JY for 12855@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:38 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09sr+ZY/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOIQppxgViDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="207195157" Original-Received: from 108-175-230-88.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.175.230.88]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 12 Nov 2012 15:57:11 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BFC15592BD; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:57:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50A13291.2080009@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:32:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66828 Archived-At: > Probably not. Do you think the old version was more readable? The difference is fairly small (not worth changing one for the other), but if I had to choose I think I'd prefer the current code. Stefan