From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17346: 24.4.50; Why is the goal column limited to C-n and C-p ? Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:14:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398743925 24139 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2014 03:58:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 03:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17346@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 29 05:58:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WezBk-0000gs-LC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 05:58:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WezBk-00084P-Bt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:58:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WezBR-0007dF-MV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WezBI-0000d0-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:58:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WezBI-0000cw-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WezBH-0004h4-AE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:58:07 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 03:58:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17346 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17346-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17346.139874386717968 (code B ref 17346); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 03:58:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2014 03:57:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44276 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WezAw-0004fd-KG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:53584) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WezAm-0004eG-Tw for 17346@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:57:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s3T3vRfW028902; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 23:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AC8A766397; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:14:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dani Moncayo's message of "Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:43:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4925=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4925> : inlines <786> : streams <1168801> : uri <1743348> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:88384 Archived-At: > sense for the above-mentioned vertical scrolling commands (which > currently place the point at the first column after moving it to > another line). page-up and page-down do preserve the column. So it looks like the problem is in *some* scrolling commands (maybe the scroll-bar ones?). Stefan