From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8865: 24.0.50; `display-buffer' does not respect `pop-up-frames' Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:46:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4DF7B1BB.6050704@gmx.at> <4DF87A4F.60704@gmx.at> <5F95025D0ABE4561A305F30293828F38@us.oracle.com> <4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at> <68E985ED37824BE799A9C01162553E22@us.oracle.com> <4DF8EF87.8080903@gmx.at> <7923A876A42744A39EEC6AAB67362EAC@us.oracle.com> <185D134A9D484823B6473FD6B358D248@us.oracle.com> <134D56CC977B4CB289C6F019A73A5F2D@us.oracle.com> <475597D23B844C31AAD37F8F9782FCC4@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308347252 10731 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2011 21:47:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8865@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 23:47:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgss-0004p1-L3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 23:47:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgsr-0004y9-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgsa-0004xn-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgsZ-0002eR-1O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgsY-0002eN-Vq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgsY-0000q9-9J; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8865.13083471963189 (code B ref 8865); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2011 21:46:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgs8-0000pN-4i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXgs5-0000pC-P1 for 8865@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:46:34 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p5HLkRGk001404; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:46:27 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 727BC149E9E; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:46:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <475597D23B844C31AAD37F8F9782FCC4@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:31:54 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3891=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3891> : streams <651631> : uri <896052> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:47:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47276 Archived-At: >> > My question was about replacing such a test. The common >> > denominator of the intentions behind using such tests is >> > what all of those tests do (have in common): distinguish >> > nil `pop-up-frames' from non-nil. Nothing more. >> If that's all you want to do, then "(if pop-up-frames" is (trivially) >> the only answer. > Well, yes, in Emacs 20-23. But if `pop-up-frames' is being deprecated > then what is the _replacement_ for such a test, going forward? If your point is to test pop-up-frames, then by all means do that. And if it disappears, then change your code so it doesn't signal an error. As long as you don't give me the intention behind the check, there is no better answer. Stefan