From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8927: 24.0.50; Flaw in C-x v u Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:10:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309094019 14360 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2011 13:13:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8927@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 15:13:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap9a-0006CT-Uz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:13:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap9a-0005Id-0H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:13:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56747) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap7A-0004wJ-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap79-0002Cv-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap79-0002Co-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap78-0005Tf-Gq; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8927 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8927-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8927.130909381420995 (code B ref 8927); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8927) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2011 13:10:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap6K-0005Sa-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qap6I-0005SO-Vy for 8927@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:10:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAJEuB05MCqDH/2dsb2JhbABTp0Z4iHTAHYYwBJ4RhCk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,428,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="117142981" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.199]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Jun 2011 09:10:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 760E258FD6; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:10:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:59:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:11:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47502 Archived-At: > it has just created it. The fix for your problem would presumably be for > vc-revert to only kill the buffer if it did not exist beforehand. Right, that's the least we can do. > But personally I still wish it would not always insist on showing me > the diff. I'd agree. It should still prompt for confirmation, of course, at which point the user can go get the diff if there's any doubt. Stefan