From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>, 8911@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#8911: bs-cycle-next deletes window in some cases.
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:06:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv62nnqmiz.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E0AD02D.4020207@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:41 +0200")
>> Because 99% of the calls are wrong (they just want to display
>> a specific buffer and the author did not consider what should happen if
>> called in a minibuffer-only frame or in a dedicated window).
> Why aren't minibuffer-only frame windows automatically dedicated?
Maybe just because they predate the notion of dedicatedness?
Or because a minibuffer-only frame will show different buffers at
different times (think of echo-area buffers, recursive minibuffers,
...), so "dedicated" isn't quite right.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 11:01 bug#8911: bs-cycle-next deletes window in some cases Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-21 13:37 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-21 14:00 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-21 14:42 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-21 15:02 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-21 16:12 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-21 16:21 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-21 16:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-21 16:37 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-22 2:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-22 2:31 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-22 20:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-21 16:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-21 16:28 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-21 17:15 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-22 2:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-22 2:53 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-22 3:13 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-22 20:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-22 22:01 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-23 21:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-25 21:24 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-26 9:29 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-26 11:25 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-27 1:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-27 1:53 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-27 7:00 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-27 9:38 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-27 12:46 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-27 14:01 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-27 14:12 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-27 14:22 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-27 20:11 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-29 3:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-29 3:57 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-30 17:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-30 18:50 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-07-01 12:07 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-29 7:11 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-30 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2011-06-29 11:36 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-06-29 15:36 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-29 18:21 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-30 7:00 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-30 15:31 ` Drew Adams
2011-06-22 2:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-06-21 16:36 ` martin rudalics
2011-06-21 17:07 ` Drew Adams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwv62nnqmiz.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=8911@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).