From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12583: latest org-mode changes exposes bug in `comment-forward'in newcomment.el Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <91FE7CF1DA974412A922D439CF16A994@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349539971 7116 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2012 16:12:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12583@debbugs.gnu.org, 'Le Wang' To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 06 18:12:56 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzm-00028T-ER for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:12:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzg-0003t8-I2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWze-0003ss-6F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzd-0005cP-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:46 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzd-0005cL-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzt-0008JU-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:13:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12583 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12583-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12583.134953994231908 (code B ref 12583); Sat, 06 Oct 2012 16:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2012 16:12:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzG-0008Ia-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:58511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TKWzE-0008IU-Hu for 12583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q96GC3vD026821; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 40273B40A1; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 12:12:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <91FE7CF1DA974412A922D439CF16A994@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 6 Oct 2012 08:53:42 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65273 Archived-At: > For my own use, I wonder whether I should be calling `c-n-v' before > I make use of `comment-search-forward'. Yes, you should. > BTW, why are there so many things besided commands that have autoload > cookies in newcomment.el? I know that you are not particularly in > favor of unnecessarily autoloading variables, so I wonder what the > story is here. Thx. The functionality of newcomment.el used to be in simple.el and hence preloaded. To make the transition as smooth as possible (there were already plenty of changes) I autoloaded all the things which used to be preloaded. Stefan