From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13023: 24.3.50; lexical binding does not work within defadvice Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:42:37 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87io27dkp4.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454442204 23169 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2016 19:43:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13023@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 02 20:43:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgr0-00037J-LW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:43:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqz-0004KO-MG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:43:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqw-0004KG-1E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:43:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqs-0004yt-0u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqr-0004yp-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:43:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqr-0001Js-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13023 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13023-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13023.14544421615038 (code B ref 13023); Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13023) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2016 19:42:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57084 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqX-0001JC-LM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:39484) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aQgqU-0001J3-R6 for 13023@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 14:42:39 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u12Jgb1D020094; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:42:37 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 548BF661C6; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:42:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87io27dkp4.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Tue, 02 Feb 2016 19:35:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5569=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5569> : inlines <4260> : streams <1581170> : uri <2131707> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112287 Archived-At: > does the above mean that this bug should be closed? To the extent that I don't know of anyone who intends to fix this problem, I guess we could close it as "won't fix". Stefan