From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41781: 27.0.91; [PATCH] Eldoc describes the wrong function when reading an expression from the minibuffer Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83h7v6w51h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="38651"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 41781@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Koning Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 23 16:10:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjd1-0009wG-5d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:10:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41870 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjd0-0000sz-3W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:10:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjcg-0000j8-9P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjcf-0001GB-Uf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:10:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjcf-0004lu-P6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41781 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41781-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41781.159292135718281 (code B ref 41781); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41781) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2020 14:09:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36919 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjbw-0004kn-LV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:38748) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jnjbu-0004kY-Qm for 41781@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3BFA280AB3; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 639AE805BA; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:07 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1592921347; bh=FReRrCLoyo1y6/318cYjg1Nf9UfAa4yhGpGYJjxQAlc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=fVgcVDDLyTc0tJIVy4OLtHwjIkvcP0Ej6KmJrqRNSj3GS2XYGn91X3YM1rOkO1ZMC ls2NDI9kxHzr/g0+fZD6qnS5GLTBM6BRctPAidlvAnL10mVA4BkO4uZjaplZTULZ+w V8T9RWfuVeVRC/vJcMMWUmcse9zU9y+t4KFbxQUes2TvRzil2tmNzTB/dsJ6MEPE/K 83U52kbjZaNkpgZ+YaCD+UOZ6HiNKToZ0qR7oosXtKKKN8UYx2BITK2QXTSBBGLOLK 2gegsGCWvau5hhTvXYNsqEx27CPGaHfaPWLmPSMigs3YFe8bafkH844BVPyU3lRYKD cP/K3J92kgrww== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [108.175.228.207]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 146C0120302; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:09:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Koning's message of "Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:58:11 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:182315 Archived-At: >> Then you'd create an `emacs-lisp-minibuffer-mode` by deriving from >> some "normal" `minibuffer-local-mode`. > Do you suppose it might be sensible to rename > `minibuffer-inactive-mode' to `minibuffer-local-mode' right away (or > `minibuffer-mode', `minibuffer-base-mode', or some such)? No, the `minibuffer-inactive-mode` is the mode used when *not* in the minibuffer. Its main purpose is to install a special keymap (which can basically only be really used when you have a separate minibuffer frame). > Right now, unless overridden by eshell or another package like it, the > minibuffer is always in `minibuffer-inactive-mode', I don't think that's true in the sense of "you get the behavior of minibuffer-inactive-mode" (most importantly you don't get its keymap). It may be true in the sense of "that's what `major-mode` says", but that's rather irrelevant. Stefan