From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66991: Confusion in interactive-form with commands with bare interactive forms. Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:38:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83wmut1pb1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30462"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 66991@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 07 18:39:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q3T-0007gH-Cp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 18:39:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q2y-0004Uu-5u; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:39:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q2u-0004UX-JC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q2u-0004Nj-A8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:39:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q3W-0008A2-1S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 17:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66991.169937876131310 (code B ref 66991); Tue, 07 Nov 2023 17:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Nov 2023 17:39:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43246 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q2q-00088v-U7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:39:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:60362) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1r0Q2p-00088j-UB for 66991@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2023 12:39:20 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 73B41100068; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:38:36 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1699378715; bh=I9YeG85aDn4vEv95ushI+2NLDCHaFXJ3ZkrybzBae0w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OewiGbdvn/s2SJHtMguLa3dyOBrsh9RtnU6j0oJH3pEMkUIoKD80VqA0YcNkC7Cmt qBeacIdUafAiG3jwuZqO7r/a9EPf+dT+3ykd2GdYddohKOzV/zpFdC5VdFnuRrNLJL T4FB3PhSmJZEJYEyOKf40tp+CMijP2cLw8Qao/O8JEpqPlmc+cPR9gH6r2pQzWSv3Z ST+nKsGwIjuAV70KlkU++QWsfvca/EeOJtpLh/AFdSfEdmNYOTKbDM6uWLvvzvbmTO 6uWB8VMOV60a9/NjX3rNPfwbkJscEmy+kETaijQyhV0l3pFeCCJhqNbR11ukZbKtOB BZdt3k17tY7Hg== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BD0CC100033; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:38:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.212.125]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91E76120313; Tue, 7 Nov 2023 12:38:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2023 17:10:02 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273942 Archived-At: > I get a failure in /test/src/comp-tests.log in test > comp-tests-interactive-form, where the test is expecting > > (interactive) > > but the result of running the test innards is > > (interactive nil) I'd argue the test should accept either form. > .. I don't understand why I'm only seeing this test failure now. Indeed, it's odd. > Maybe it's a new test. `git log test/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp-tests.el` suggests there's been no activity there of late. > OK. :-) But I think fixing data.c will be easier and cleaner than > fixing all the tests which might test it. I wouldn't call it a fix because I don't think the current behavior is broken, but I see no problem with `interactive-form` replacing `(interactive)` for `(interactive nil)` when it can do so cheaply. It may break other (broken) tests, of course. Stefan