From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5127: Indentation of top level tags when no single top level tag Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:04:22 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 5127@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259990868 32481 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2009 05:27:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 05:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5127@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 06:27:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NGnBD-0006ZL-It for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:27:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58713 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGnBD-0005tY-78 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:27:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGnB8-0005sD-2P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:27:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NGnB3-0005pM-9m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:27:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53385 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGnB3-0005pI-6E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:47742) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NGnB3-0007al-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB55ROQE008192; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:27:25 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nB55A7V1006599; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:10:07 -0800 Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:10:07 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs 2Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:10:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5127 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5127-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B5127.12599894705227 (code B ref 5127); Sat, 05 Dec 2009 05:10:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5127) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Dec 2009 05:04:30 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id nB554Sr1005224 for <5127@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:04:29 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAI94GUtFpZ7i/2dsb2JhbACBTNQghDMEihw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,346,1257138000"; d="scan'208,217";a="50733939" Original-Received: from 69-165-158-226.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.158.226]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2009 00:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F16B070213; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:04:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:17:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:27:33 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:33234 Archived-At: > Sometimes a user is working with part of a code and still want to do > indentation. In cases like this > > > > the body tag will currently be intended to column 0 by sgml-indent-line. What's wrong with that? Or do you mean it shoujld be indented to the same level as the preceding ? Stefan