From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9528: 24.0.50; Info navigation Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:24:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mxe1li9l.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316442318 29263 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2011 14:25:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9528@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 19 16:25:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5emX-0002lh-Tl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:25:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5emX-0003zc-DF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5emP-0003up-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5emM-00070Q-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R5emM-00070L-GB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5erD-0000VG-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9528 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9528-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9528.13164425591854 (code B ref 9528); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9528) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2011 14:29:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5eqU-0000Tq-JI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R5eqR-0000Ti-JG for 9528@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:29:16 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG1Pd05FpZ7x/2dsb2JhbABCpyR4gVMBAQVWIxALNBIUGA0kvTqGeASgToRE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,405,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="137114494" Original-Received: from 69-165-158-241.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.158.241]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 19 Sep 2011 10:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CD728591F1; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:24:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2011 08:49:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51476 Archived-At: FWIW, I'm with Dani on this one: maybe jumping back to the intermediate "Functions" node makes sense for deep reasons, but there are good superficial reasons to ignore this internal node for `l'. And Emacs (and I think UIs in general) likes "superficial". Stefan