From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11879: 24.1.50; delete-trailing-whitespace now removes empty lines at end of file Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:31:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342391539 22878 80.91.229.3 (15 Jul 2012 22:32:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Matt Arsenault , 11879@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 16 00:32:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXMO-00061l-La for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:32:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56306 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXMN-0002rx-Ur for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXMK-0002rg-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXMJ-0002lk-Py for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXMJ-0002lg-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXRy-0008Ed-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11879 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11879-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11879.134239186331626 (code B ref 11879); Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11879) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2012 22:37:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43220 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXRf-0008E3-Fr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:50995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SqXRe-0008Dw-0k for 11879@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6FMVl7Y021570; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:31:48 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 42F99AE323; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:31:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 13 Jul 2012 23:08:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4280=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4280> : streams <785155> : uri <1166211> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:61972 Archived-At: >> This appeared during the Emacs 24 feature freeze, I don't see why. >> I suggest using an optional prefix argument to control this. > Why not treat it as an annoying regression, which it is? I can't remember the exact details, but I do remember it being introduced on purpose (tho the purpose might not have justified it). I think it was judged that a new custom var for it or a new function was not needed. And, while there is a change, I haven't yet seen a clear argument that this change is a problem. Stefan