From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13165: Fwd: Newlines in file names Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:29:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355758195 30992 80.91.229.3 (17 Dec 2012 15:29:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13165@debbugs.gnu.org To: Whitfield Diffie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 17 16:30:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkcds-0006lT-2u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 16:30:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34270 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkcde-00078N-Pc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:29:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkcdc-000784-6Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:29:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkcdX-0001fz-HK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:29:52 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TkcdX-0001fu-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:29:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tkcej-0002Kf-ML for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13165 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13165-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13165.13557582338928 (code B ref 13165); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13165) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2012 15:30:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TkceG-0002Jw-CF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:30:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:33516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TkceE-0002Jp-Af for 13165@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:30:30 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLDj/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA4hCmnGBWIMH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="210077249" Original-Received: from 69-196-176-227.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.176.227]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Dec 2012 10:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E71245912C; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:29:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Whitfield Diffie's message of "Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:04:19 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68644 Archived-At: >> I find it hard to see (null (file-exists-p (dired-get-filename))) >> as anything but a bug; if ls didn't put the filenames in the right >> form, dired should have done so. I don't understand what you're saying here. How could dired guess what is the right form if ls doesn't provide it? Tho, I guess that with "ls --dired" the extra data returned by ls could arguably provide the needed info. Stefan