From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14886: Fwd: bug#14886: Fwd: A significant slowdown calling font-lock-fontify-buffer from a hook Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:03:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <51E69331.9070007@cs.ucla.edu> <20130724193039.GA11879@acm.acm> <20130726194428.GA3974@acm.acm> <20130727093556.GA3616@acm.acm> <51F39EF6.8050408@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374934040 21313 80.91.229.3 (27 Jul 2013 14:07:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , Paul Eggert , 14886@debbugs.gnu.org, Juanma Barranquero To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 27 16:07:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V359T-0000TJ-B1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:07:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V359S-00064O-Pq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46759) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V359L-0005aC-70 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V356L-0007FD-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58601) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V356L-0007F9-2L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V356I-0008Bc-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:04:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14886 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14886-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14886.137493384031456 (code B ref 14886); Sat, 27 Jul 2013 14:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14886) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2013 14:04:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V356C-0008B8-4L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:29435) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V3569-0008Ag-Lb for 14886@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:03:54 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZPn/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNAcLFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFpZPn/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNAcLFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="19970546" Original-Received: from 69-165-147-231.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.147.231]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 27 Jul 2013 10:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 890C062E93; Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:03:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <51F39EF6.8050408@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sat, 27 Jul 2013 12:20:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76711 Archived-At: >> I've tried a brief ediff between the font-lock files in 24.3 and trunk, >> but haven't spotted the difference yet in font-lock-fontify-buffer which >> I suspect is there. > Why should there be any difference? The value that differs is that of > `font-lock-fontify-buffer-function'. Calling `font-lock-fontify-buffer' > from prog-mode does `font-lock-default-fontify-buffer'. Calling it from > c-mode does `jit-lock-refontify'. Or what am I missing? So it's back to the problem of font-lock-fontify-buffer meaning two different things. Could someone look into providing font-lock-ensure-fontification and font-lock-mark-for-refontification, and mark font-lock-fontify-buffer obsolete? Stefan