From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Barry OReilly <gundaetiapo@gmail.com>
Cc: 15045-done@debbugs.gnu.org, David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>,
Eric Ludlam <eric@siege-engine.com>
Subject: bug#15045: Point jumps inappropriately around time of Semantic lexing
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:29:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwv4n7c82eb.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFM41H0CNt1mR4u-B72qC9QDUmunJPCMarq819-debnY=0apYQ@mail.gmail.com>
>> Inside a while-no-input, if the user hits a key (or clicks), then a
>> `throw' is executed that exits the while-no-input.
> I thought input-pending-p covers that base.
The difference is that input-pending-p does polling (you have to keep
calling input-pending-p), whereas while-no-input is interrupt based (it
will stop whatever you're doing when the key comes in).
> If we use while-no-input, don't we still need to use
> accept-process-output, thus not solving the problem?
Might very well be: while-no-input does not by-itself let processes run.
I don't know what the CEDET code does, so I just mentioned
while-no-input as something related, but indeed it might not solve
our problem.
>> Then please go ahead and install your change.
> Thanks, rev 115123. Closing.
Great, thank you,
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-16 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 17:59 bug#15045: Point jumps inappropriately around time of Semantic lexing Barry OReilly
2013-08-07 18:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-07 18:42 ` David Engster
2013-08-07 19:31 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-07 19:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-07 20:39 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-08 2:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 17:07 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-08 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-07 21:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 17:21 ` David Engster
2013-08-08 18:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 18:13 ` David Engster
2013-08-08 21:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 22:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 7:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 14:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 14:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 17:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 20:03 ` Barry OReilly
2013-08-08 20:30 ` David Engster
2013-08-08 21:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 5:36 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 7:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 11:50 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-08-09 13:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 14:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 14:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 18:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 18:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 18:41 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 20:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 21:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-10 9:42 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 21:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 16:10 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 18:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-10 9:54 ` David Engster
2013-08-10 10:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-10 18:06 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-14 19:32 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-14 19:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-15 13:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-15 14:12 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-15 16:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-15 17:08 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-15 18:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-15 19:19 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-16 2:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-16 14:57 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-16 17:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-16 18:32 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-17 15:03 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-17 18:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-17 20:01 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-18 0:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-10-18 14:03 ` Barry OReilly
2013-10-25 19:15 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-14 18:21 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-16 4:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-16 4:54 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-16 17:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-11-16 20:33 ` Barry OReilly
2013-11-16 21:29 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2013-08-09 18:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 9:12 ` martin rudalics
2013-08-09 16:27 ` David Engster
2013-08-09 17:10 ` martin rudalics
2013-08-09 18:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 21:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-08 21:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 22:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-08-09 7:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-08 21:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-09 3:26 ` Eric M. Ludlam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwv4n7c82eb.fsf-monnier+emacsbugs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=15045-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=deng@randomsample.de \
--cc=eric@siege-engine.com \
--cc=gundaetiapo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).