From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19479: Package manager vulnerable Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:37:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420771119 5051 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2015 02:38:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 02:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19479@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 09 03:38:32 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSl-0005W4-9M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 03:38:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSk-0005wh-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:38:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSg-0005wZ-V4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSd-0007S2-It for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59445) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSd-0007Rv-GF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSc-0000hl-RK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 02:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 19479-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19479.14207710822702 (code B ref 19479); Fri, 09 Jan 2015 02:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19479) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2015 02:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40578 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSb-0000hV-GN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:38:01 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34261) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9PSX-0000hJ-86 for 19479@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:37:59 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t092buWJ022287; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 21:37:56 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 095CB53F; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 21:37:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kelly Dean's message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2015 21:06:35 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5180=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5180> : inlines <1737> : streams <1370320> : uri <1841765> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98120 Archived-At: >> You're one of the very rare oddballs who can't >> be bothered to sign a trivial document to get this out of the way > That's not true. I offered to sign a document saying my work is PD. I didn't mean "a trivial document" in the sense "any trivial document", but rather "the particular trivial document that everybody else signed". Stefan