From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56637: 28.1.90; [FR] Allow a way around font-lock-mode being unconditionally disabled in " *hidden*" buffers Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:13:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874jzdhh5m.fsf@localhost> <837d49ntwg.fsf@gnu.org> <874jzc4e1x.fsf@localhost> <837d48m332.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgh21xbg.fsf@localhost> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3644"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 56637@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 17:14:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXsU-0000ij-1p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:14:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58994 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXsS-0003yN-LT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXsI-0003wc-Oe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXsI-0007iu-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXsI-0005qx-BQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56637 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56637-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56637.165841640722441 (code B ref 56637); Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56637) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2022 15:13:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXrj-0005pt-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31848) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oEXri-0005pe-4H for 56637@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 860B880767; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:13:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 020C580012; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:13:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1658416399; bh=MB+WfzS/W36Yh/vYwIhcQdMEYCbjKgvARoQ/jgAObX4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=kFEPEHBlOkVtP3+oRNte9LL3Bq359EYLdMovp43CKcjYDGL3AnW/y+TeZvfMcC8Bq qgo8DJhRNOWuKxJSPkDlcbM1l4iL5hnnIswFvbZGcGlWnMr6zFBLB3hhlhg7BIkxku szz1f0ulgGk2L/D43ywhQvMRxAEbrG2C3EDn2BxX3o/B7Jt5WAu6aL0GA7quDwPc4v NeG2G0nKw1cTqB/Ef5Z1wMU3ajrw5E4k8KP0iDTKX1mLr/LtonLDwc7jOY9c4IhdUS CSTKdPJk1wsgw7q7/uq6NVJ3pPj5tekqSU1f8fxU/L9rYQHUgGq1JI/o6IUhDPsg1S PgeEkbTubakJQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.195.111]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF5E012026E; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:13:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87zgh21xbg.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:09:55 +0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237558 Archived-At: > Observed output: #("(message \"Foo\")" 9 14 (face font-lock-string-face)) > Expected: #("(message \"Foo\")" 0 9 (fontified t) 9 14 (face > font-lock-string-face fontified t) 14 15 (fontified t)) `fontified` is not a text-property that belongs to font-lock but to jit-lock, so its presence or absence depends on how font-lock is being used (it can also be absent if you set `font-lock-support-mode to nil, for example, and it can also be present even if you don't use font-lock at all), so I would count this as "an incorrect expectation" rather than as a bug. Why do you care about those `fontified` properties? Stefan