From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1287: FW: Re: bug#1287: 23.0.60; emacs 23.0.60 does not build on x86_64 architeture Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 20:53:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1KxQz1-0IceMS0@fwd02.aul.t-online.de> <208wrzm59p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 1287@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225851036 5560 80.91.229.12 (5 Nov 2008 02:10:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 02:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1287@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Chong Yidong To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 05 03:11:38 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KxXrs-0007js-I0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:11:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxXqj-000500-5h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxXqa-0004ve-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KxXqX-0004vR-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55129 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KxXqX-0004vH-HF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:46428) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KxXqW-0001vP-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mA52A5dk016349; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:10:05 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mA5203lu013205; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:00:03 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1287 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1287-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1287.122585001711921 (code B ref 1287); Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1287) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Nov 2008 01:53:37 +0000 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mA51rXXr011914 for <1287@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:53:35 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAFCLEElMCqyo/2dsb2JhbACBdsoCg1OBDw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,547,1220241600"; d="scan'208";a="29358273" Original-Received: from 76-10-172-168.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.172.168]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2008 20:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 674EE82DF; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:53:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <208wrzm59p.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:37:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:10:15 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22170 Archived-At: > Any reason not to change the configure.in test that sets > HAVE_LIB64_DIR from > if test -d /usr/lib64 > to > if test -e /usr/lib64/crtn.o Do we always use "crtn.o" in lib64? Is fo, then it sounds like a good idea, indeed. Stefan