From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8789: 23.3; debug backtrace buffer changes window on step-through Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4DE8DF63.5050405@gmx.at> <87haz0po82.fsf@web.de> <4F3BE4CB.3030909@gmx.at> <4F3CB843.6030401@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329400429 25768 80.91.229.3 (16 Feb 2012 13:53:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 8789@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 14:53:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1m4-00035V-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:53:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51254 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1m3-0001jG-RI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:53:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1lx-0001jA-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1ls-0000rB-09 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:53:21 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1lr-0000r7-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:53:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1nb-0000kc-2O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:55:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8789 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8789-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8789.13294004572827 (code B ref 8789); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8789) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2012 13:54:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42373 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1mr-0000jY-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:50294) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry1mo-0000jQ-2G for 8789@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:54:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q1GDqPbr025824; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D3CA35929A; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:52:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4F3CB843.6030401@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:03:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4133=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4133> : streams <729212> : uri <1066519> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56936 Archived-At: >> Can you provide another patch that limits the effect to the >> backtrace buffer? > Can you? I think that using `display-buffer-overriding-action' would be > too harsh so we would have to specify this via the ACTION argument in > (pop-to-buffer debugger-buffer). A patch in that direction is below. Looks fine to me, feel free to install, thank you very much, Stefan