From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14399: octave-mode bug Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:19:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <230D3614-8BA1-4161-9B2E-6174894BF1D4@partech.com> <1519578.TJIQRgHRXt@descartes> <877gbtasem.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385832016 18016 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2013 17:20:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14399@debbugs.gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 30 18:20:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoDM-0007tU-Ka for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:20:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52754 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoDM-0004LE-7o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:20:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoDC-0004KO-7p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:20:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoD4-0005Rf-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoD4-0005QA-QM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoD3-0000s5-TT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14399 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14399-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14399.13858319803315 (code B ref 14399); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 17:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14399) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2013 17:19:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoCi-0000rP-3i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:19:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:62745) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VmoCf-0000rA-0h for 14399@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:19:37 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFMCoY2/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFMCoY2/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="40774271" Original-Received: from 76-10-134-54.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.134.54]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Nov 2013 12:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1093760351; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:19:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877gbtasem.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:37:21 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81155 Archived-At: >> That's the part I knew already ;-) >> >> But in which way is >> >> a = [ foo;... >> bar ] >> >> different from >> >> a = [ foo >> bar ] >> or >> a = [ foo; >> bar ] > For these three examples there is no difference because the newlines and > whitespace the continuation marker gobbles up wouldn't terminate or > alter the statement. Thanks. So it begs the question: why would someone write a = [ foo;... bar ] instead of one of the other two? I'm trying to understand what's the intention behind it, to better understand how the code should behave. Stefan