From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16155: 24.3.50; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <749544c4-49e7-462f-b64c-26725cf35a59@default> <13d75185-288f-4b71-bb80-e5af13a7f8c6@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387990526 10020 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2013 16:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org, josh@foxtail.org, Richard Stallman To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 25 17:55:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrk0-00048D-Cl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:55:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42865 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrjz-0003Hb-T8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:55:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrjl-0003GY-Pr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:55:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrjb-0002UJ-Uv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:55:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrjb-0002Sz-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrja-0004Z2-6c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 16:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16155 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.138799050017536 (code B ref -1); Wed, 25 Dec 2013 16:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2013 16:55:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvrjX-0004Ym-Uq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:55:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38480) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvrjU-0004YW-GN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvrjK-0002L0-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:56 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvrjK-0002Kw-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvrjC-0003An-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrj2-0002Io-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:37 -0500 Original-Received: from moderators.individual.net ([130.133.4.7]:43040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vvrj2-0002IE-Lr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.82) for gnu-emacs-bug@moderators.isc.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Vvrj1-001Y85-Oo>; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:54:28 +0100 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBPGs7K8006704; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:12 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8C322AE0E9; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 11:54:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 25 Dec 2013 00:49:32 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4802=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4802> : inlines <357> : streams <1096870> : uri <1634798> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82583 Archived-At: >>> Are those programming modes? Maybe you're right for programming modes, >>> but you made the change for Text modes too. >> I'm not sure if/why there should be a difference. Maybe the behavior >> needs to be adjusted for text-mode (i.e. for the case where >> indent-line-function is `indent-relative'), but I don't think it applies >> to all text modes (e.g. latex-mode, nxml-mode, ...). > There is a difference. Care to explain which? Oh wait, better yet: first fix your bug (i.e. that cc-mode ignores electric-indent-mode), and then come back and "explain which". Stefan