From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53227: master: Wrong error message with M-: (funcall). Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:19:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874k683smu.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtk0ugjn.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmov52gx.fsf@igel.home> <87fspr4pga.fsf@igel.home> <87pmov2un5.fsf@igel.home> <87lezj2nds.fsf@igel.home> <87h7a72mta.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17446"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 53227@debbugs.gnu.org, acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org, rpluim@gmail.com To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 14 01:21:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AL8-0004MZ-96 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 01:21:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AL7-00063e-1g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AL0-00063K-J6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AL0-0004SD-92 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AL0-0002Oh-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 00:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53227 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53227-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53227.16421196089112 (code B ref 53227); Fri, 14 Jan 2022 00:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53227) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2022 00:20:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34876 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AK4-0002Ml-Ef for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:21456) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8AK1-0002M9-S5 for 53227@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 841C0805B4; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:19:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AC07980533; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:19:53 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1642119593; bh=yhrb7jN/MD0IKwnbPYLZ/HcucK0etfI9HCf8F96nFUw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=oJhRM74RoyyawY/mokEmpfH9t9lfV0X4d35DjOh9eIcX1C0PZqgA54oXKxy//xt2r mBpOOgwgQKO16paa/6xW30Nt4XrbK4PVGGBGm4ZATGMwpcrgFPSw2MMaXuS7i7Ulj3 yWh2G+gbzwQANKipwRVFKun5UNEfXsKSOJf3xdaZAgWZ7S6y//P4kQ3TX64tPABca7 Xb0bLnbvII1S04owBLRZ2k+mb/UxL6AWSWmgMe94GF2YUnQ7DDHd3jjFtPzgGdehyV 5oa9aWxayJ1wr6JlwGvgkm3gzFXBTs37c/l2l/5pvSu/uk9tXs/z2MFZuQp4XrlbA0 YjFTa/4cFdcMw== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B89A12041E; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 19:19:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87h7a72mta.fsf@igel.home> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2022 01:17:05 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:224146 Archived-At: >> (`(funcall . ,_) form) ;bug#53227 >> >> is then present to make sure the first change doesn't worsen the >> rest of the resulting macroexpanded code. > > I don't understand. How much better than (funcall) can it get? I'm not talking about the quality of the code output by `macroexp--expand-all` but about the quality of the code *of* `macroexp--expand-all`. Stefan