From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#895: slow processing of process output Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:17:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309983734 9394 80.91.229.12 (6 Jul 2011 20:22:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 20:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 895@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 06 22:22:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeYbn-00062Y-61 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 22:22:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33722 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeYbl-0008NT-OI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeXbo-0006yD-9B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:18:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeXbm-0006Vn-BV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QeXbl-0006Vg-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeXbl-00039Y-PD; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 895 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 895-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B895.130997986312092 (code B ref 895); Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 895) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jul 2011 19:17:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeXbS-00038z-Df for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QeXbQ-00038g-2h for 895@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:17:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAJKzFE5FxIV4/2dsb2JhbABTqAd4iHrDT4Y3BJ5rhC8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,488,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="120708537" Original-Received: from 69-196-133-120.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.133.120]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Jul 2011 15:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 39F8B660D9; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 15:17:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:32:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:18:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48124 Archived-At: > For example compare the time to run make bootstrap when using M-x > compile vs doing it in an xterm. Agreed. I encourage people to try and look into this problem. First thing is to profile to figure out where the time is spent. Stefan