* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled @ 2017-07-15 21:50 npostavs 2017-07-21 12:23 ` npostavs 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: npostavs @ 2017-07-15 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 27718; +Cc: Alex [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 329 bytes --] ~/src/emacs$ .../emacs -Q -batch -f batch-byte-compile cl-typep-subclass.el ~/src/emacs$ .../emacs -Q -batch -l cl-typep-subclass.el (cl-typep eitest-ab ’class-a) => t ~/src/emacs$ .../emacs -Q -batch -l cl-typep-subclass.elc (cl-typep eitest-ab ’class-a) => nil Where cl-typep-subclass.el is [-- Attachment #2: test file --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 382 bytes --] (require 'eieio) (require 'eieio-base) (require 'eieio-opt) (eval-when-compile (require 'cl-lib)) (defclass class-a () () "Class A") (defclass class-b () () "Class B") (defclass class-ab (class-a class-b) () "Class A and B combined.") (defvar eitest-ab nil) (setq eitest-ab (class-ab)) (message "(cl-typep eitest-ab 'class-a) => %S" (cl-typep eitest-ab 'class-a)) [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 930 bytes --] This test case is a reduction from test/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio-tests/eieio-tests.el. You can see that tests 23 and 24 will fail when you do 'make eieio-tests TEST_LOAD_EL=no'. In GNU Emacs 26.0.50 (build 64, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, X toolkit, Xaw scroll bars) of 2017-07-15 built on zony Repository revision: b30ee0c9225bad6e3fd0b511a6c5d9a64b8fd66a Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11901000 Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Configured using: 'configure --cache-file=../debug-config.cache 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3 -march=native' --enable-checking=yes,glyphs --enable-check-lisp-object-type MAKEINFO=makeinfo-4.13a --with-x-toolkit=lucid --with-toolkit-scroll-bars --with-gif=no --with-jpeg=no' Configured features: XPM TIFF PNG RSVG SOUND GPM DBUS GSETTINGS NOTIFY ACL GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS LUCID X11 LIBSYSTEMD ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-15 21:50 bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled npostavs @ 2017-07-21 12:23 ` npostavs 2017-07-21 13:19 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: npostavs @ 2017-07-21 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 27718; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, Alex [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1443 bytes --] tags 27718 + patch quit npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes: > ~/src/emacs$ .../emacs -Q -batch -f batch-byte-compile cl-typep-subclass.el > ~/src/emacs$ .../emacs -Q -batch -l cl-typep-subclass.el > (cl-typep eitest-ab ’class-a) => t > ~/src/emacs$ .../emacs -Q -batch -l cl-typep-subclass.elc > (cl-typep eitest-ab ’class-a) => nil lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el:260: (defmacro defclass (name superclasses slots &rest options-and-doc) ... ;; When using typep, (typep OBJ 'myclass) returns t for objects which ;; are subclasses of myclass. For our predicates, however, it is ;; important for EIEIO to be backwards compatible, where ;; myobject-p, and myobject-child-p are different. ;; "cl" uses this technique to specify symbols with specific typep ;; test, so we can let typep have the CLOS documented behavior ;; while keeping our above predicate clean. (put ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) The problem is that the `put' doesn't take effect until runtime, so the compiler inlines `cl-typep' incorrectly. Using `function-put' here (and `function-get' in `cl-typep') solves it (requires also the patches for #27016[1]), although it seems a bit coincidental that `class-a' happens to be a function as well, so I'm not sure if this is the right thing. Stefan, any thoughts? [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: patch --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2390 bytes --] From 4ea34c9da04c8eabc754f2ca64ef4e2ac7c59cac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 07:59:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v1] Fix (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) compilation (Bug#27718) Using `function-put' instead of `put' for the `cl-deftype-satisfies' property lets the compiler know about it while compiling the file so that any calls to `cl-typep' will be inlined correctly. * lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el (defclass): Use `function-put' for the `cl-deftype-satisfies' property. * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (cl-typep): Also use `function-get' to check the 'cl-deftype-satisfies' property. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el | 7 +++++-- lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el index 451e6490d7..f5a4f99aad 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el @@ -2991,8 +2991,11 @@ (define-inline cl-typep (val type) ((and (pred symbolp) type (guard (get type 'cl-deftype-handler))) (inline-quote (cl-typep ,val ',(funcall (get type 'cl-deftype-handler))))) - ((and (pred symbolp) type (guard (get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies))) - (inline-quote (funcall #',(get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies) ,val))) + ((and (pred symbolp) type (guard (or (function-get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies) + (get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies)))) + (inline-quote (funcall #',(or (function-get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies) + (Get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies)) + ,val))) ((and (or 'nil 't) type) (inline-quote ',type)) ((and (pred symbolp) type) (let* ((name (symbol-name type)) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el index 1a7de55fce..2c333c16f4 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ (defmacro defclass (name superclasses slots &rest options-and-doc) ;; test, so we can let typep have the CLOS documented behavior ;; while keeping our above predicate clean. - (put ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) + (function-put ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) (eieio-defclass-internal ',name ',superclasses ',slots ',options-and-doc) -- 2.11.1 [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 286 bytes --] > You can see that tests 23 and 24 will fail when you do 'make > eieio-tests TEST_LOAD_EL=no'. This actually isn't true until the patch for #24402[2] is applied. [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27016#140 [2]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24402#71 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-21 12:23 ` npostavs @ 2017-07-21 13:19 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-07-22 17:51 ` npostavs 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-21 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: npostavs; +Cc: 27718, Alex > The problem is that the `put' doesn't take effect until runtime, so the > compiler inlines `cl-typep' incorrectly. Using `function-put' here (and > `function-get' in `cl-typep') solves it (requires also the patches for > #27016[1]), although it seems a bit coincidental that `class-a' happens > to be a function as well, so I'm not sure if this is the right thing. > Stefan, any thoughts? Hmm... I agree that using the same approach as that of bug#27016 is right, but indeed `name` doesn't refer to a function but to the name of a type (the property doesn't apply to the value stored in the symbol-function cell and shouldn't follow alias definitions). So maybe rather than hijack function-get/put in bug#27016, we should introduce a new "definitional put" with a corresponding `get`, and then use that here as well as in function-put/get. Maybe we could simply change put&get directly without introducing yet-another slightly different get/put? Stefan > From 4ea34c9da04c8eabc754f2ca64ef4e2ac7c59cac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 07:59:21 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH v1] Fix (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) compilation > (Bug#27718) > Using `function-put' instead of `put' for the `cl-deftype-satisfies' > property lets the compiler know about it while compiling the file so > that any calls to `cl-typep' will be inlined correctly. > * lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el (defclass): Use `function-put' for the > `cl-deftype-satisfies' property. > * lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el (cl-typep): Also use `function-get' to > check the 'cl-deftype-satisfies' property. > --- > lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el | 7 +++++-- > lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el > index 451e6490d7..f5a4f99aad 100644 > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl-macs.el > @@ -2991,8 +2991,11 @@ (define-inline cl-typep (val type) > ((and (pred symbolp) type (guard (get type 'cl-deftype-handler))) > (inline-quote > (cl-typep ,val ',(funcall (get type 'cl-deftype-handler))))) > - ((and (pred symbolp) type (guard (get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies))) > - (inline-quote (funcall #',(get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies) ,val))) > + ((and (pred symbolp) type (guard (or (function-get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies) > + (get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies)))) > + (inline-quote (funcall #',(or (function-get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies) > + (Get type 'cl-deftype-satisfies)) > + ,val))) > ((and (or 'nil 't) type) (inline-quote ',type)) > ((and (pred symbolp) type) > (let* ((name (symbol-name type)) > diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el > index 1a7de55fce..2c333c16f4 100644 > --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el > +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el > @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ (defmacro defclass (name superclasses slots &rest options-and-doc) > ;; test, so we can let typep have the CLOS documented behavior > ;; while keeping our above predicate clean. > - (put ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) > + (function-put ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) > (eieio-defclass-internal ',name ',superclasses ',slots ',options-and-doc) > -- > 2.11.1 >> You can see that tests 23 and 24 will fail when you do 'make >> eieio-tests TEST_LOAD_EL=no'. > This actually isn't true until the patch for #24402[2] is applied. > [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=27016#140 > [2]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24402#71 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-21 13:19 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-22 17:51 ` npostavs 2017-07-24 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: npostavs @ 2017-07-22 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: 27718, Alex [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --] Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: > So maybe rather than hijack function-get/put in bug#27016, we should > introduce a new "definitional put" with a corresponding `get`, and then > use that here as well as in function-put/get. > > Maybe we could simply change put&get directly without introducing > yet-another slightly different get/put? Something like this? [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: patch --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2850 bytes --] From 7645c7ff5078aa0bc937969fb1550b0f794d793e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 13:46:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Let `put' take effect during compilation (Bug#27718) * lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el: Use `byte-compile-function-put' to handle `put' as well. * src/fns.c (Fget): Consult `byte-compile-plist-environment'. * lisp/subr.el (function-get): Let `get' take care of consuling `byte-compile-plist-environment'. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el | 1 + lisp/subr.el | 7 +------ src/fns.c | 10 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el index 4dda3bdc2b..3fead4229e 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el @@ -4719,6 +4719,7 @@ (defun byte-compile-form-make-variable-buffer-local (form) (byte-compile-keep-pending form 'byte-compile-normal-call)) (put 'function-put 'byte-hunk-handler 'byte-compile-function-put) +(put 'put 'byte-hunk-handler 'byte-compile-function-put) (defun byte-compile-function-put (form) (pcase form ((and `(,op ,fun ,prop ,val) diff --git a/lisp/subr.el b/lisp/subr.el index 3e4a3dedf5..42b4e1c211 100644 --- a/lisp/subr.el +++ b/lisp/subr.el @@ -2971,12 +2971,7 @@ (defun function-get (f prop &optional autoload) if it's an autoloaded macro." (let ((val nil)) (while (and (symbolp f) - (null (setq val (or (plist-get - (alist-get - f (bound-and-true-p - byte-compile-plist-environment)) - prop) - (get f prop)))) + (null (setq val (get f prop))) (fboundp f)) (let ((fundef (symbol-function f))) (if (and autoload (autoloadp fundef) diff --git a/src/fns.c b/src/fns.c index d849618f2b..655422aa0f 100644 --- a/src/fns.c +++ b/src/fns.c @@ -1987,6 +1987,14 @@ DEFUN ("get", Fget, Sget, 2, 2, 0, (Lisp_Object symbol, Lisp_Object propname) { CHECK_SYMBOL (symbol); + Lisp_Object plist_env = find_symbol_value (Qbyte_compile_plist_environment); + if (CONSP (plist_env)) + { + Lisp_Object propval = Fplist_get (CDR (Fassq (symbol, plist_env)), + propname); + if (!NILP (propval)) + return propval; + } return Fplist_get (XSYMBOL (symbol)->plist, propname); } @@ -5125,6 +5133,8 @@ syms_of_fns (void) DEFSYM (Qkey_or_value, "key-or-value"); DEFSYM (Qkey_and_value, "key-and-value"); + DEFSYM (Qbyte_compile_plist_environment, "byte-compile-plist-environment"); + defsubr (&Ssxhash_eq); defsubr (&Ssxhash_eql); defsubr (&Ssxhash_equal); -- 2.11.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-22 17:51 ` npostavs @ 2017-07-24 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-07-24 19:44 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-24 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: npostavs; +Cc: 27718, Alex >> So maybe rather than hijack function-get/put in bug#27016, we should >> introduce a new "definitional put" with a corresponding `get`, and then >> use that here as well as in function-put/get. >> Maybe we could simply change put&get directly without introducing >> yet-another slightly different get/put? > Something like this? I guess so. But: > + DEFSYM (Qbyte_compile_plist_environment, "byte-compile-plist-environment"); I find having to hardcode byte-compile-plist-environment in get rather ugly. Stefan "sorry, I couldn't make it more constructive" ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-24 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-24 19:44 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-07-25 16:34 ` Noam Postavsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-24 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: npostavs; +Cc: 27718, Alex >> + DEFSYM (Qbyte_compile_plist_environment, "byte-compile-plist-environment"); > I find having to hardcode byte-compile-plist-environment in get rather ugly. Hmm... I'm still not quite sure how best to deal with this, but it does occur to me that we could introduce a new `define-propval' value, which would be like `put' but for use at top-level. It could differ from `put' in that the byte-compiler could keep track of those in byte-compile-plist-environment, and that they could record themselves in load-history for unload-feature to be able to undo them. It doesn't help on the `get' side, tho. Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-24 19:44 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-25 16:34 ` Noam Postavsky 2017-07-25 21:21 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Noam Postavsky @ 2017-07-25 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: 27718, Alex On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: >>> + DEFSYM (Qbyte_compile_plist_environment, "byte-compile-plist-environment"); > >> I find having to hardcode byte-compile-plist-environment in get rather ugly. > > Hmm... I'm still not quite sure how best to deal with this, but it does > occur to me that we could introduce a new `define-propval' value, which > would be like `put' but for use at top-level. It could differ from > `put' in that the byte-compiler could keep track of those in > byte-compile-plist-environment, and that they could record themselves in > load-history for unload-feature to be able to undo them. > > It doesn't help on the `get' side, tho. Right. We need `get' to be aware of what the compiler has read, so it will need to have a reference to the compiler in there somewhere. We could name it differently and point the reference in the other direction, as in DEFSYM (Qalternate_plist_environment...) and have the byte compiler use that instead, which might be slightly more aesthetically pleasing. The other possibility is to introduce a different kind of `get' and use that in places that need to be aware of what the compiler has read. I don't see a third option. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-25 16:34 ` Noam Postavsky @ 2017-07-25 21:21 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-08-05 1:06 ` npostavs 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2017-07-25 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Noam Postavsky; +Cc: 27718, Alex > Right. We need `get' to be aware of what the compiler has read, so it > will need to have a reference to the compiler in there somewhere. We > could name it differently and point the reference in the other > direction, as in DEFSYM (Qalternate_plist_environment...) and have the > byte compiler use that instead, which might be slightly more > aesthetically pleasing. The other possibility is to introduce a > different kind of `get' and use that in places that need to be aware > of what the compiler has read. > I don't see a third option. Right, so we have 3 options, indeed: - `get` looks up to byte-compile-plist-environment - byte-compile manipulates `get`s overriding-plist-environment - provide a new get-like function. Either one is fine by me, Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-07-25 21:21 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2017-08-05 1:06 ` npostavs 2017-08-05 12:49 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: npostavs @ 2017-08-05 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: 27718, Alex [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 438 bytes --] Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes: > Right, so we have 3 options, indeed: > - `get` looks up to byte-compile-plist-environment > - byte-compile manipulates `get`s overriding-plist-environment > - provide a new get-like function. > > Either one is fine by me, I'm thinking the 2nd looks best. Is it correct to `put' `byte-compile-define-symbol-prop' as the hunk handler for both `define-symbol-prop' and `function-put'? [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: patch --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 5388 bytes --] From 3e8759320ecba4156cd3315ef02ea902ff408ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:32:34 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] Let `define-symbol-prop' take effect during compilation * src/fns.c (syms_of_fns): New variable `overriding-plist-environment'. (Fget): Consult it. * lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el (byte-compile-close-variables): Let-bind it to nil. (byte-compile-define-symbol-prop): New function, handles compilation of top-level `define-symbol-prop' and `function-put' calls by putting the symbol setting into `overriding-plist-environment'. Co-authored-by: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> --- lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/fns.c | 11 +++++++++++ test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el index fdd4276e4e..a1626c0b9d 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp.el @@ -1572,6 +1572,7 @@ (defmacro byte-compile-close-variables (&rest body) ;; macroenvironment. (copy-alist byte-compile-initial-macro-environment)) (byte-compile--outbuffer nil) + (overriding-plist-environment nil) (byte-compile-function-environment nil) (byte-compile-bound-variables nil) (byte-compile-lexical-variables nil) @@ -4712,6 +4713,34 @@ (put 'make-variable-buffer-local 'byte-hunk-handler 'byte-compile-form-make-variable-buffer-local) (defun byte-compile-form-make-variable-buffer-local (form) (byte-compile-keep-pending form 'byte-compile-normal-call)) + +(put 'function-put 'byte-hunk-handler 'byte-compile-define-symbol-prop) +(put 'define-symbol-prop 'byte-hunk-handler 'byte-compile-define-symbol-prop) +(defun byte-compile-define-symbol-prop (form) + (pcase form + ((and `(,op ,fun ,prop ,val) + (guard (and (macroexp-const-p fun) + (macroexp-const-p prop) + (or (macroexp-const-p val) + ;; Also accept anonymous functions, since + ;; we're at top-level which implies they're + ;; also constants. + (pcase val (`(function (lambda . ,_)) t)))))) + (byte-compile-push-constant op) + (byte-compile-form fun) + (byte-compile-form prop) + (let* ((fun (eval fun)) + (prop (eval prop)) + (val (if (macroexp-const-p val) + (eval val) + (byte-compile-lambda (cadr val))))) + (push `(,fun + . (,prop ,val ,@(alist-get fun overriding-plist-environment))) + overriding-plist-environment) + (byte-compile-push-constant val) + (byte-compile-out 'byte-call 3))) + + (_ (byte-compile-keep-pending form)))) \f ;;; tags diff --git a/src/fns.c b/src/fns.c index d849618f2b..00b6ed6a28 100644 --- a/src/fns.c +++ b/src/fns.c @@ -1987,6 +1987,10 @@ DEFUN ("get", Fget, Sget, 2, 2, 0, (Lisp_Object symbol, Lisp_Object propname) { CHECK_SYMBOL (symbol); + Lisp_Object propval = Fplist_get (CDR (Fassq (symbol, Voverriding_plist_environment)), + propname); + if (!NILP (propval)) + return propval; return Fplist_get (XSYMBOL (symbol)->plist, propname); } @@ -5163,6 +5167,13 @@ syms_of_fns (void) DEFSYM (Qcursor_in_echo_area, "cursor-in-echo-area"); DEFSYM (Qwidget_type, "widget-type"); + DEFVAR_LISP ("overriding-plist-environment", Voverriding_plist_environment, + doc: /* An alist overrides the plists of the symbols which it lists. +Used by the byte-compiler to apply `define-symbol-prop' during +compilation. */); + Voverriding_plist_environment = Qnil; + DEFSYM (Qoverriding_plist_environment, "overriding-plist-environment"); + staticpro (&string_char_byte_cache_string); string_char_byte_cache_string = Qnil; diff --git a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el b/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el index d15bd8b6e6..8ef2ce7025 100644 --- a/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el +++ b/test/lisp/emacs-lisp/bytecomp-tests.el @@ -545,6 +545,23 @@ (ert-deftest bytecomp-tests--old-style-backquotes () This functionality has been obsolete for more than 10 years already and will be removed soon. See (elisp)Backquote in the manual."))))))) + +(ert-deftest bytecomp-tests-function-put () + "Check `function-put' operates during compilation." + (should (boundp 'lread--old-style-backquotes)) + (bytecomp-tests--with-temp-file source + (dolist (form '((function-put 'bytecomp-tests--foo 'foo 1) + (function-put 'bytecomp-tests--foo 'bar 2) + (defmacro bytecomp-tests--foobar () + `(cons ,(function-get 'bytecomp-tests--foo 'foo) + ,(function-get 'bytecomp-tests--foo 'bar))) + (defvar bytecomp-tests--foobar 1) + (setq bytecomp-tests--foobar (bytecomp-tests--foobar)))) + (print form (current-buffer))) + (write-region (point-min) (point-max) source nil 'silent) + (byte-compile-file source t) + (should (equal bytecomp-tests--foobar (cons 1 2))))) + ;; Local Variables: ;; no-byte-compile: t ;; End: -- 2.11.1 [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #3: patch --] [-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1014 bytes --] From 848a5eb1ed15bb975fe308464b2891b160c5a420 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 19:50:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] Let the cl-typep effects of defclass work during compilation (Bug#27718) * lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el (defclass): Use `define-symbol-prop' instead of `put'. --- lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el index 1a7de55fce..8b92d5b7ac 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/eieio.el @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ (defmacro defclass (name superclasses slots &rest options-and-doc) ;; test, so we can let typep have the CLOS documented behavior ;; while keeping our above predicate clean. - (put ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) + (define-symbol-prop ',name 'cl-deftype-satisfies #',testsym2) (eieio-defclass-internal ',name ',superclasses ',slots ',options-and-doc) -- 2.11.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-08-05 1:06 ` npostavs @ 2017-08-05 12:49 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-08-08 1:16 ` npostavs 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2017-08-05 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: npostavs; +Cc: 27718, Alex >> Right, so we have 3 options, indeed: >> - `get` looks up to byte-compile-plist-environment >> - byte-compile manipulates `get`s overriding-plist-environment >> - provide a new get-like function. >> Either one is fine by me, > I'm thinking the 2nd looks best. Is it correct to `put' > `byte-compile-define-symbol-prop' as the hunk handler for both > `define-symbol-prop' and `function-put'? I think so, yes. Stefan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled 2017-08-05 12:49 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2017-08-08 1:16 ` npostavs 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: npostavs @ 2017-08-08 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: 27718, Alex tags 27718 fixed close 27718 26.1 quit Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes: >>> Right, so we have 3 options, indeed: >>> - `get` looks up to byte-compile-plist-environment >>> - byte-compile manipulates `get`s overriding-plist-environment >>> - provide a new get-like function. >>> Either one is fine by me, >> I'm thinking the 2nd looks best. Is it correct to `put' >> `byte-compile-define-symbol-prop' as the hunk handler for both >> `define-symbol-prop' and `function-put'? > > I think so, yes. Pushed to master. [1: cc30d77ecd]: 2017-08-07 18:54:49 -0400 Let `define-symbol-prop' take effect during compilation http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=cc30d77ecdd1b9155ade3d0656a84a0839ee2795 [2: b5c8e9898d]: 2017-08-07 18:54:49 -0400 Let the cl-typep effects of defclass work during compilation (Bug#27718) http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=b5c8e9898d9dbd4145c40d08e8eef84a5e32008a ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-08-08 1:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-07-15 21:50 bug#27718: 26.0.50; (cl-typep instance-ab 'class-a) gives wrong answer when compiled npostavs 2017-07-21 12:23 ` npostavs 2017-07-21 13:19 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-07-22 17:51 ` npostavs 2017-07-24 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-07-24 19:44 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-07-25 16:34 ` Noam Postavsky 2017-07-25 21:21 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-08-05 1:06 ` npostavs 2017-08-05 12:49 ` Stefan Monnier 2017-08-08 1:16 ` npostavs
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).