From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45831: 28.0.50; list-colors-display callback arg needs to evaluate to a function? Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:27:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sg2iyjdz.fsf@tbb.theblackbeard.org> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33995"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 45831@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mauro Aranda Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 21:28:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llcix-0008ef-Ix for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 21:28:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llciw-0007Fz-LC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llcim-0007EX-2Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35335) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llcig-0004w8-Kk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llcig-0003iD-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 19:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45831 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 45831-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45831.162197085114231 (code B ref 45831); Tue, 25 May 2021 19:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45831) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 May 2021 19:27:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llciB-0003hR-D9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:11926) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1llciA-0003hF-3F for 45831@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EB35D4412E0; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:27:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ABCC74412C2; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:27:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1621970843; bh=y/AkVdK/fzjxWtYH6zScE2lNlo2evukWcMuIUlBJuXw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XB5uz6wojRClpDqRlT6zj8mI8XYp73d0nZr1KbgJ4rgz0FfKNEHvT8qhTz2R8zof2 +0zAXRPqEnBAPG+eX5TwVI1gZ57icpmfGvKlLT3K81MgH40UVrk00jucGeKAa4mHOv olmJcGj6zUnC1YoXDx9aA5HU1ZfNEae2FGwG9v7y+KIBJgyp1Rar6t49gTtlTnhzRh FYjLjKi3POjbRK0Eshxj3XIGK9vYYtc/pGUw5exGcb97gHTqGr3xB/sm+ThvjGNrSj dH9jYZXH0oYU1Py/bBYtqFtl5C2a69EFKQqaAKF0fQ0YSpBIyvfL4lPTR4O6AoCnGz epY6tB4UvtaTQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-196-163-239.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.163.239]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F452120270; Tue, 25 May 2021 15:27:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sg2iyjdz.fsf@tbb.theblackbeard.org> (Mauro Aranda's message of "Wed, 19 May 2021 09:53:44 -0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:207241 Archived-At: > It seems like this message and the other one you sent to this bug > address didn't reach the bugtracker, perhaps because the bug is archived > (I didn't have the time to read the docs about that). Would you mind > resending them, but unarchiving the bug first? Surprisingly I didn't get any message back warning me about the bug being archived, but indeed it seems it was archived. I just unarchived it, but I don't think my messages were important enough to deserve a resend. >>> Feel free to drop the 2nd cond clause if backward-compatibility is not >>> deemed too important here. >> It seems it's only backward compatible with a calling convention that >> was never documented, so it's probably not necessary, indeed. > Either way, I do agree with you that it's probably not necessary, but I > wanted the patch to be simple so the bug reported would get fixed > quickly. That part is done, so feel free to drop that sneaky backquote ;-). Wise strategy, Stefan