From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:17:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8i2abqi.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2ilgx7.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5ze9uc1.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkq9rpy.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm898xb9.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6tlleg0.fsf@gmail.com> <8335558qc7.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3611"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic , Eli Zaretskii To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 16:18:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbId-0000fQ-GT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:18:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbIU-0008Ex-Li; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbIR-0008EN-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:18:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbIQ-0005mG-2k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:18:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbIP-0002W3-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.16813090549632 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 14:17:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40560 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbHx-0002VI-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:17674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmbHw-0002V4-K1 for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5D98A805D6; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:17:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E8FAA80148; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:17:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1681309041; bh=L1n5q3EUjTAR1jVSTnGkpcmPkBY2BBdW67TKbdoEeg8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ZzzMlmwQW4Wn1amZvnhw5f/aiZ2JgFH9SCVzXegSDBD9VqU/Lr+/7HET9QHDZC8+m SI7QR6OPKRILk8mLYTbBnKe0D+bqQoT+x7413K8ibp4cR6SubH6aHJCp/qIWKLKU2S YYIQKpU61o60VlOVUc5vrv+AjN2U3diY4fpnom9J4lWjTfvAX2bNphGS8N0VB5U5TP QQ5PiKzK33CjHKKuD98F19O4euElVNf/jdGdLadQyv9/NGVAzhs89Q/gJaYvL57ygB mQefmFn/FzCeI50RMx1Bx08PWhLplsp1hUIiyTo0G22IkUEwjGSK9BBOpxwhnFkIN5 RMpNMzRlRUYJQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.217.176]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5E091202F2; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:17:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:14:11 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259749 Archived-At: > Isn't "bundled" better left for when non-core, non-builtin ELPA > packages are somehow thrown together with the Emacs release tarball or > the platform-specific builds we make of them? I can't see any reason why that would make a difference here. AFAICT this only matters in terms of which Git repository/branch holds the source code and how it gets included into the Emacs distribution, but after that it's an "internal detail". Stefan