From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@glug.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: RMAIL, summary buffer need not be marked as modified
Date: 06 Mar 2003 11:48:41 -0500
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <jk7kbcl9ue.fsf@glug.org>
References: <200302122117.h1CLHZZh000624@oak.pohoyda.family>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046970720 26037 80.91.224.249 (6 Mar 2003 17:12:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 06 18:11:59 2003
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18qyuV-0006ln-00
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:11:59 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18qytt-0005oC-04
	for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 12:11:21 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18qyhz-0002k2-00
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 11:59:03 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18qyYh-00084I-00
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 11:49:29 -0500
Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.84.69])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18qyY1-0007oG-00
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 11:48:45 -0500
Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1)
	id 18qyXx-0003l2-00; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 11:48:41 -0500
Original-To: Alexander Pohoyda <alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: Alexander Pohoyda's message of "Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:17:35 +0100
	(CET)"
Original-Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
 <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:4573
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:4573

Alexander Pohoyda <alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net> writes:

   Hi again,

   I have to admit that the modified *RMAIL-summary* buffer irritates
   me. This buffer is generated by emacs, so there is nothing user should
   care about.

   +    ;; There is no need for the summary buffer to be marked as modified.
   +    (set-buffer-modified-p nil)

probably a better approach would be to use a mode-line format for RMAIL
summary mode that omits the superfluous information.

thi